Compare How War Is Portrayed in the Poems Dulce Essays

Compare How War Is Portrayed in the Poems Dulce Essays Compare How War Is Portrayed in the Poems Dulce Essay Compare How War Is Portrayed in the Poems Dulce Essay It Is Important to note that both toes had experience of war and that as such we cannot comment on differences relating from distance to the sub]etc_ Owens poem Is a story of a gas attack In the First World War. Using pathetic fallacy (ewe cursed through sludge) and negative language he sets up a scene of sheer horror. He begins by describing their weary march. He describes them using language like bent double, asleep and knock- kneed. This immediately gives the impression of fatigue, and he goes on to use negative language such as blood-shod, lame and blind to convey the dire straits which they are in. The poem is in Iambic Pentameter which is very rhythmic and emphasizes the last syllable of each line which is often used in rhyme, as in this poem (even though enjambment takes away the full emphasis). He uses enjambment and plosive language to emphasis particular ideas such as beggar and flares. These both change the rhythm in either speed or rhythm. The rhythm is indeed slow at first and this causes the reader to mull over what Owen is saying. However in the second stanza the rhythm picks up to articulate the sudden rush of a gas attack. Owen uses a mix of quickening language and words with short syllables to peed the stanza up such as Quick! Quick! and Ecstasy. This contrasts with Brocks poem which maintains a steady rhythm throughout the poem, this tone makes it feel very Instructional and dry. Brock, in his poem, talks about various deferent forms of warfare and killing in a very cold and instructional sort of way. Brock alludes to Christ, and to the decreasingly barbaric ways of killing men that have developed. Brock also refers to gas over one verse during his poem, however he does not concentrate on it as Owen does. This also speaks of the deference of background teen the two authors; Brock was a navy sailor during the Second World War, while Owen was a rifleman during the First World War. Brock, In part to emphasis the brutal efficiency of his poem, does not use pathetic fallacy. Brock also uses enjambment, especially between lines (never between verses this causes an uninterrupted rhythm throughout the poem. Both poems portray war very differently: however they both seem to think that the terms death and war are synonymous. This may be classed as simply the shared view of two veterans of war: however this could also be seen as a means to the ends of thwarting war. Having said this Owen does not say that they are as closely linked as Brock does. Owen sets up teen poem as set In war Ana teen uses tenant as alter teen conclusion to teen story, or as, at least, a means to the end. Owen makes it very clear that war is responsible for this death: in the rush, one man clumsily drops his mask, and the narrator sees the man floundering like a man in fire or lime. Owen then talks about how he has to throw the man into the back of a wagon and the mans hanging face, like a devils sick of sin. Owen contrasts the idea of drowning as a peaceful death with his reality f it: He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning. There is also some very strong imagery here: As under a green sea, and He plunges at me. Note that plunge is a plosive word and is therefore emphasized. This is also true as with flung in the next verse. It is however the last verse that speaks the most about death. It uses much negative imagery to bring its point about such as: devils sick of sin, and froth- corrupted lungs. This makes the poem very powerful in the point that it is trying to bring about. He also makes the reader Join the battle, as it were, by stating: If in mothering dreams you coul d pace, this allows the reader to really connect with this. In Brooks poem the poet speaks of death and war as the same thing. The title is quite significant in this theme: Five Wap to Kill a Man, and he goes on to describe various forms of warfare. Brock speaks of death in an increasingly clinical way; this signifies the loss of humanity in war. It begins by speaking of crucifixion where you need people. It ends by speaking of Aircraft where you dont even have to see, or know the people that you bomb and then about living a life in the twentieth century which he remarks is like a living death: leave him there. The steady rhythm of the poem also highlights the clean brutality of it all there is no speeding-up, no highlighting of death at any point. Brock uses a lot of neutral imagery in his poem. He even speaks of crucifixion and the man who has to nail the victim to the post as neutral: and a man to hammer the nails home. In this poem Brock speaks to the reader as if giving instruction, he does not speak personally at all about anything. T here if the victim who Just serves as the he in the poem and anyone else is Just referred to as a third person noun. This makes the poem very impersonal and makes sure that there is no connection between reader and victim which allows the poem to be read without emotion of any kind which could distort the meaning of the poem it is intended to show the loss of humanity (the loss of emotion) rather than describe vivid and terrifying images of war. This is not to say that he does not use strong imagery, he Just doesnt describe it in a terrifying way: a length of steel rather than a bloodied sword. This is opposed to Owens poem which is very personal, referring to the reader at various points such as If you could hear My friend, you would not It is also written in first person and directed at Journalists and other poets of the time who were writing about Joining the army, such as Jessie Pope who encouraged young men to Join the army, including Owen himself. Both poems aim to make the reader against the notion of war. In my personal opinion Brooks poem contributes to this cause better as it is written from a viewpoint which is far from war, which is what I am and thus I connect more with it. However other than with my own personal opinion I cannot compare these poems anymore as they are so different in delivery. Both achieve their purpose.