Social identity theory of intergroup conflict Essay

Social identity operator theory of inter multitude conflict - Essay ExampleBased on the findings in accordance to the menti aned aspects, further explanation has been provided in remark of the behavioural implications of Social Identity Theory. Definition of Identity As explained in the Identity Theory in Walumbwa & et. al. (2011), the term Identity is quite challenging to be defined with the use of a momentary and agreeable statement that can succinctly hold the range of its meaning. Conceptually, identity, as a term, refers to the social categories and sources of an idiosyncraticists self-respect or dignity at the same time, which often becomes a major device driver of intergroup disputes. To put it in simple words, identity is the combination of what features a person or a amour beholds, i.e. the uniformity of a person or a thing at all the time. According to the field of honor of Gao & Riley (2010), the identity features in a person commonly involves certain attributes th at may be termed as midland stickiness, which at a broader context can be examined to hinder psychological knowledge ownership of a person and raise issues in terms of possessiveness. ... characteristic attributes or social behaviour or (b) may refer to socially distinctive features those are identifiable when a person deciphers a degree of soak in his/her attitude in a manner that is somewhat unchangeable but socially consequential, or (a) and (b) at once. The social identity theory expands the meaning of Identity to a broader realm, which is completely different from the captured translation of the term in dictionary (Walumbwa & et. al., 2011). Notably, these two major attributes (a) and (b) differ from superstar group to another, reflecting through the individual role performances and hence, are likely to become a major reason of intergroup conflict (Walumbwa & et. al., 2011). Correspondingly, it can be argued that studying identity shall contribute towards the mitigation of intergroup conflicts and therefore contribute to a healthier relationship amid the group members. Significance of studying Identity in understanding intergroup conflicts The social identity theory differentiates personal identity and social identity explaining that personal identity is an explanation and estimation of oneself in terms of idiosyncratic personal attributes or ones specific relationship with other people. On the contrary, social identity is a description and valuation of oneself in relation to shared attributes that expresses the specific groups membership one belongs to (Schwartz, 2011). As explained by Kraus (2011), social identity works as a member of group, and not as an individual. In self-identity, therefore, there is no outside influence to control an individuals perspective one way or the other, whereas in social identity, a persons self-identity is combined with the groups identity, to which one belongs and becomes more aware of what they