Interpersonal, Group and Collective Behavior Dynamics Essay

Enron is a federation that is faced with financial derangement but continues to run on dubious dealings including misrepresenting their true financial position (Cohan, 2002). This is done to hold back the public image of the company hence avoiding the risk of losing investors. American International Group (AIG) is alike in a serious financial crisis following cases of mismanagement (FRB, 2009). We shall make a comparison of the group dynamics and internal politics within these both companies. The companies exhibited an element of information blockage.This is holding back adverse give-and-take from the public until the last possible moment. This is usually a deliberate act with the aim of maintaining a goodish public image. It is however followed by lawsuits, hate mails or plane death threats from unhappy investors. In Enrons case, the senior executives withheld any information about financial crisis from the public until it collapsed (Cohan, 2002). AIG maintained a business a s usual image in the public despite its liquidity issues (FRB, 2009).Motivation to lie or by design concealing the truth in an organization was evident in the two companies. The corporate officers do not disclose the truth especially when this truth may put the company into bankruptcy or address them their jobs. In the case of Enron the lies were inform of hard data, lying about accounting results and a stream of wampum (Williamson, 1970). Questionable accounting practices were meant to hide huge losses that the company suffered. AIG had its sh be of deliberate lies when it valued its A-A and submarine sandwich prime property at 1.7 twice the value used by Lehman. The issue of the bills all oversight function and the business judgment rule is also fairly evident in the two companies he board of directors act as if they are entitled to rely on the silver dollar and integrity of their subordinates until something wrong happens (Crag & Rebecca, 1996) . The directors of Enron wer e totally unaware of the severity of the companys financial crisis until its collapse. A directors were overly ignorant of the liquidity problem to the extend of planning for a lavish retreat for themselves.The subordinate motorcoachs adjudge persuasive interest in concealing the bad news. This is meant to avoid or delay personal bewilderment and opposite associated risks such as the likelihood of a price drop in its shares. In Enron, separate executives who decided to hide the dubious partnership feared erosion of status (Cohan, 2002). They felt that they needed to protect both their self and external image. The same case was evident in AIG, where the subordinate managers saw the need for over costing their assets to redeem their image.Overconfidence and optimism is displayed in the two companies by the senior executives especially in invite releases. Overconfidence creates a strong image for any company in the eyes of the public. Executives who are plus and optimistic are considered to be successful managers. This is because they are able to persuade and influence people even in the face of a crisis. The executives in Enron and AIG were also in the bid of making a identify for themselves. Senior executives assured employees would continuously rise even in the event of financial instability in Enron.The chief executive officer in AIG assured investors that they would still get their bonuses even as the company was being bailed out (FRB, 2009). Corporate culture cannot be ruled out in the management of the two companies. This refers to the norms of the company which are well known to the management and the subordinate employees. They supersede other business or ethical laws in case of a conflict. Cynism as a corporate culture fosters the breaking of rules as a means to succeed. Ethical rules are under enforced with the focus being to maximize profits.The Enron and AIG were caught up in this culture when they faced a financial crisis. They misrepresent ed their debts and assets respectively in the companys sheet so as to reflect high profits and attract investors (Cohan, 2002). All this is done in total disregard for accounting ethics. Myopic information within the organization is also prevalent in the two companies. This might be due to our limited cognitive capabilities but more so because the executives are too busy to deal with abundant data. They prefer sifting this data and extracting only what is relevant.They may also be lacking the skill to analyze and understand the data as was the case of Enrons actor death chair Mr. Kenneth Lay. The directors in AIG and Enron, focused on information that confirmed their prior attitudes of leading institutions in the market. They snub any disconfirming information of possible collapse or liquidity issues. This is normally referred to as cognitive dissonance. It is usually difficult to change these beliefs as one is seen as a threat to the companys status quo. Ms. Watkins, an employee in Enron became such a threat by warning a senior manager of a possible collapse (Cohan, 2002).A chief executive officers proposal in AIG was ignored on the same basis (FRB, 2009). Intimidation of subordinate employees by the senior employees is prevalent in Enron but not in AIG. In Enron, investigations against Mr. Andrew a former chief financial officer and other senior officers who were involved in fraud cases did not happen since no one was confident plenteous to confront them (Cohan, 2002). In AIG the accounting scandal is thoroughly investigated and no one is spared including a former chairman of the board.REFERENCES Federal Reserve Bank. (2009). History and development of AIG. Retrieved May 26,2009, from http//www. federalbank. orf/history/development. pdf Herbert, A. S. (1955). A behavioral model of quick-scented choice. John, A. C. (2002). I didnt know and I was only doing my job. Has corporate governance careened out of function? A case study of Enrons information myop ia. Journal of Business Ethics, 40 (3),275-299. Paul Z. & Janet A. (1997). The societal influence of confidence in group decision making.