Do revolutions 'happen' or are they 'made' Discuss with reference to Essay

Do revolutions 'happen' or are they 'made' Discuss with reference to at least two theories of revolution, and using exa - Essay Example A revolution is known to be a change, a metamorphosis for the outbreak of the whole political, social and economic system of a certain area. The whole setup is not just crashed because of some unknown reason of just by a group of people who are seeking their vested interest; rather, there is some lack and seepage in the system which in turn gives rise to the revolution. The primary advocates of this theory include Aristotle. He says that causes of every revolution lie in mass spread inequalities, rejection of the working class by elite class of the society and oppressive behavior of the rich. The rejectionist behavior that is faced by majority of the masses makes them set their foot out for a change that will bring them eventually some honor, pride, power and money. Abuse of standards of legal frameworks and misuse of power by the privileged class are also the main causes of revolution. ... will try to oscillate the running system because the majority is happy with the system and any attempt from outside to throw away the current regime will not be entertained by the environment or the people. According to this theory, the revolutions are triggered by the events caused by the running class, and then these events can be manipulated by other parties who have their own interests in the coming revolution, but this does not mean that revolutions are made up by some powers initially. The idea is that each revolution is started internally on some causes that are very much anticipated in the books of revolution. Aristotle said that under corrupt regimes, people are tired to rule over by fear and brutal behaviors. As a result of this, the ambitious people get their emotions beefed up and they set out some movements to change the tyrant and oppressive ruling class. This is the stage when other powers can show interest, but the starting of the revolutions has already taken place. Karl Marx was in support of the same theory as he said potential working class and lower middle class are often offended by the upper class or the rich class because they regard themselves as some kind of more privileged people than others. They think the production in society is earned by them, and this gives them every right to harm or humiliate the lower classes. They can also hurt their feelings because they are gentiles in their view. As a result, the consequences take the form of revolution and the working class uses their numerical edge and power of numbers against the ruling class because the suffered class has always been in majority and exploitative classes are always in minority. When there is an open battle between minority and majority, the end result goes in favor of majority