'Advantages and Disadvantage of technology\r'

'Technology changes and improvements bear been applied in all sectors of the economy as comfortably as the arms of the government.  Many employees and employers and the order in general embrace engine room in different perspective depending on the concern it will ca uptake on their lives.The constabulary department as galore(postnominal) other sector has in any case been embracing technological changes to be able to wish hygienic with the increasing cases of aversions.  Generally, any applied science will either have a positive or negative impact on all stakeholders.The recent engineering science that the jurisprudence have continuously utilise is the manipulation of bedaze guns and patrol gondola car scene management to tackle miserable activities and provide protection to the citizens.Use of the daze guns.Stun guns atomic number 18 weapons that atomic number 18 pushed at disabling a victim temporarily by delivering postgraduate voltage electric sho ck.  on that point are various means in which the stun gun is put ond to a victim.  The aim of the stun gun to disable a victim plainly umteen masses have ended up existence killed by the utilize of guns.Tasers are a type of stun gun straightway be used by the natural law in the United States â€Å"[Tasers] are knowing to incapacitate by conducting 50,000 volts of electricity into your body.  The galvanic pulses induce skeletal muscles spasms that immobilize and incapacitate, causation you to collapse to the ground”, (Indyhack 2007).According to Eliot, more than cl raft have died in the US because of universe struck by tasers since January 2001, and 61 in 2005.  Most of the death victims died because of macrocosm subjected to multiple or prolonged shock.  The police have been drawing the tasers so cursorily even in cases that the use of such extreme force is not necessary.  For instance,Deputies pink-slipped Tasers at a teenager who ran a fterward not paying $1 mound fare, a 71 †year who refused to approach into a police car, and partially deaf man who could not hear deputies parliamentary law him to stop…Ab away three out of four of those shocked by Seattle police were unarm, (Indyhack 2007).Apart form the abuse of the Tasser weapons by the police, the use of the Tasser suffer have side case on the victim, in the long run. There is no any scientific proven research d champion to allay fears rough the electrocuting of human universes by use of the gadget.Taser save relies on two studies.  The studies were done by company paid researchers’ on a single pig in 1996, and on 5 dogs in 1999, (Indyhack 2007).  Because of lack of scientific research, health hazards supportnot be ruled out.Despite these problems associated with the use of the stun gun police, have vehemently defended the weapon use.  They argue that the weapon can be used rather than police handguns especially on victims w ho are armed with different weapons other than guns, or on victims who are mentally sick.  In this case, whatsoever lives will be saved because of the use of the less lethal weapons.Patrol car video chargeMany stack because of the fact that it has played a great(p) role in preventing crime have welcomed the video surveillance technology.  This arrangement is one of the technologies that have quite well used to control criminal activities in most cities, homes, business building and macrocosm places.It has been widely accepted by some people that the surveillance governance has extremely trim downd the cases of criminal activities, â€Å"Instead of being perceived as an Orwellian intrusion, the cameras in Britain proved to be extremely popular. They were hailed as the people’s technology, a favorable eye in the sky, not full-grown Brother at all but kindly and watchful uncle or auntie”, (Arroyo, 2002).The problem with using the surveillance is when it is feature with other technologies such as biometric facial recognition, thermal sensing, infrared, and other that greatly heighten human visual capabilities (Arroyo 2002).If this system is used in line with the audio recording, the system will violate Title 1 of the Electronic Communications Act.  This is because the combination of the surveillance style and audio recording without a soul’s knowledge is violating the person’s privacy.  This is especially a big problem if the police use the systems without being controlled, as they infringe on many rights of the people.The other problem that is associated with this system is that it also implicates on peoples free social life.  The monitor of peoples’ movement in the union implies that a person will not be a free man in his own society, as someone someplace is watching his movements. This system seems to undermine the people’s way of life as well as compromising it.Therefore, despite the f act that the surveillance might reduce many cases of criminal activities as some people argue, it at the same beat causes destruction to the way of living of people and inducing the to conformity as one is not sure whether he is being watched or not. Those who argue for the use of the surveillance system, they do see that the issue of warranter has become more important than exactly the social part of life. Hence logical argument for the continued use of the system.ConclusionBoth use of the stun gun and the surveillance machine can be of much beneficial to the society only if they are applied in the correct manner that does not in any way infringe on a person’s rights.  Or else, as much as they are being applied as now, they have left many people’s rights abused.\r\n'